<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<CourseUnit xmlns="http://www.manchester.ac.uk/CUICourseUnitDetails" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.manchester.ac.uk/CUICourseUnitDetails.xsd">
  <UnitCode Applicant="Y" Label="Unit code" Student="Y">
    <Code>DRAM60182</Code>
  </UnitCode>
  <UnitTitle Applicant="Y" Label="Unit title" Student="Y">
    <Title>Approaches to Audiences and Fandom</Title>
  </UnitTitle>
  <MaxUnits Applicant="Y" Label="Credit rating" Student="Y">
    <Units>30</Units>
  </MaxUnits>
  <TeachingPeriods Applicant="Y" Label="Teaching period(s)" Student="Y">
    <Period>Semester 2</Period>
  </TeachingPeriods>
  <AcademicCareer Applicant="Y" Label="Academic career" Student="Y">
    <Value>Postgraduate Taught</Value>
  </AcademicCareer>
  <UnitLevel Applicant="Y" Label="Unit level" Student="Y">
    <Level>Level 7</Level>
  </UnitLevel>
  <StaffList Applicant="Y" Label="Teaching staff" RoleLabel="Course Unit Role" Student="Y">
    <StaffMember>
      <Name>Darren Waldron</Name>
      <Role>Unit coordinator</Role>
    </StaffMember>
  </StaffList>
  <OfferedBy Applicant="Y" Label="Offered by" Student="Y">
    <OrganisationList>
      <Organisation>
        <OrgName></OrgName>
      </Organisation>
    </OrganisationList>
    <GroupList>
      <Group>
        <GroupName></GroupName>
      </Group>
    </GroupList>
    <FheqLevels>
      <FheqLevel>
        <LevelNumber>1</LevelNumber>
        <LevelName>FHEQ level (Framework for Higher Education Qualifications) ' Masters/Integrated Masters P4 ' </LevelName>
      </FheqLevel>
    </FheqLevels>
    <Ects>
      <MaxUnits>European Credit Transfer &amp; Accumulation System Rating :   15.0</MaxUnits>
    </Ects>
  </OfferedBy>
  <MarketingOverview Applicant="Y" Label="Marketing Course unit overview" Student="">
    <Content>&lt;p&gt;The relationship between screen texts and their audiences has been a preoccupation of screen culture for decades. Taking a broad look at this key concern, this course introduces students to some of the key debates and approaches to ‘audiences’ and ‘fans’ as contested terms. How do industry producers and institutions imagine, target and measure their audiences? How have scholars conceptualised the audience as abstract 'spectators' as well as socially situated individuals and groups? What do audiences actually do with screen texts? Students will critically engage with scholarship on industry and audience practice across screen culture in various contexts, including ideological issues and the social audience; 'reading against the grain'; participatory fandom and transmedia; and disruptive 'anti-fandom' counter-approaches. The course will be structured around blocks of two weeks in which central topics and approaches will be discussed, followed by a session in which students explore their own research ideas developing these themes. The course aims to equip students with both knowledge of the history and practice of audience research, alongside an awareness of the latest developments, practices and concerns.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</Content>
  </MarketingOverview>
  <UnitOverview Applicant="" Label="Course unit overview" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;p&gt;The relationship between screen texts and their audiences has been a preoccupation of screen culture for decades. Taking a broad look at this key concern, this course introduces students to some of the key debates and approaches to ‘audiences’ and ‘fans’ as contested terms. How do industry producers and institutions imagine, target and measure their audiences? How have scholars conceptualised the audience as abstract 'spectators' as well as socially situated individuals and groups? What do audiences actually do with screen texts? Students will critically engage with scholarship on industry and audience practice across screen culture in various contexts, including ideological issues and the social audience; 'reading against the grain'; participatory fandom and transmedia; and disruptive 'anti-fandom' counter-approaches. The course will be structured around blocks of two weeks in which central topics and approaches will be discussed, followed by a session in which students explore their own research ideas developing these themes. The course aims to equip students with both knowledge of the history and practice of audience research, alongside an awareness of the latest developments, practices and concerns.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</Content>
  </UnitOverview>
  <Aims Applicant="Y" Label="Aims" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Introduce students to key concepts and approaches in audience theory and fan studies within screen culture&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Critically reflect upon how screen texts invite audience reactions, and how actual social audiences and fandoms respond to them&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Develop a critical understanding of how audiences and fandoms are imagined and constructed in screen industry practice&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Critically engage with key debates and approaches in the field, and apply audience/fan theory to specific case studies in student research.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</Content>
  </Aims>
  <LearningOutcomes Applicant="Y" Label="Learning outcomes" Student="Y">
    <Content></Content>
  </LearningOutcomes>
  <Knowledge Applicant="Y" Label="Knowledge and understanding" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Demonstrate a critical understanding of audience and fan studies: students will gain a thorough knowledge of the key theoretical and critical frameworks within these fields&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between audience practices and broader cultural, industrial, and technological contexts&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Assess the ideological and social dimensions of audience engagement, including issues of identity, power, and resistance in media consumption.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</Content>
  </Knowledge>
  <IntellectualSkills Applicant="Y" Label="Intellectual skills" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Make effective use of research whilst applying concepts to individual work &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Synthesise and analyse information from a range of sources and use this to engage with existing scholarship in the field&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Integrate interdisciplinary insights from film studies, cultural studies and industry research to form nuanced perspectives on audience engagement.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</Content>
  </IntellectualSkills>
  <PracticalSkills Applicant="Y" Label="Practical skills" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Demonstrate advanced critical writing skills &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Undertake research design and presentation at Masters’ level &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</Content>
  </PracticalSkills>
  <TransferableSkills Applicant="Y" Label="Transferable skills and personal qualities" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Exercise independence in self-directed learning&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Demonstrate advanced ability to articulate ideas and argument cohesively, comprehensively and effectively. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</Content>
  </TransferableSkills>
  <EmployabilitySkillsList Applicant="Y" Label="Employability skills" Student="Y">
    <Skill>
      <SkillId>Group/team working</SkillId>
      <SkillDescription>Enhanced ability to work productively, both independently and as part of a group, and as part of learning processes that present complex challenges</SkillDescription>
    </Skill>
    <Skill>
      <SkillId>Oral communication</SkillId>
      <SkillDescription>Present advanced ideas and intellectual arguments visually and verbally using digital tools</SkillDescription>
    </Skill>
    <Skill>
      <SkillId>Problem solving</SkillId>
      <SkillDescription>Advanced critical thinking, problem-solving and planning skills</SkillDescription>
    </Skill>
    <Skill>
      <SkillId>Written communication</SkillId>
      <SkillDescription>Enhanced ability to adapt self-presentation to different audiences/contexts, especially when communicating complex ideas</SkillDescription>
    </Skill>
    <Skill>
      <SkillId>Other</SkillId>
      <SkillDescription>Advanced ability to exercise initiative and personal responsibility</SkillDescription>
    </Skill>
  </EmployabilitySkillsList>
  <Syllabus Applicant="Y" Label="Syllabus" Student="Y">
    <Content></Content>
  </Syllabus>
  <TeachingMethods Applicant="Y" Label="Teaching and learning methods" Student="Y">
    <Content></Content>
  </TeachingMethods>
  <AssessmentMethods Applicant="Y" Label="Assessment methods" Student="Y">
    <IntroText> </IntroText>
    <Method>
      <MethodId>0</MethodId>
      <MethodName>Other</MethodName>
      <MethodWeight>100%</MethodWeight>
    </Method>
    <OtherDescription>&lt;p&gt;Critical essay or audience research project proposal, including outline, aims, methodology, and justification &amp;nbsp;100%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plan for Summative Assessment - Formative&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Formative in-class student presentations - Formative&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</OtherDescription>
  </AssessmentMethods>
  <FeedbackMethods Applicant="Y" Label="Feedback methods" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;p&gt;Critical essay or audience research project proposal - written feedback&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plan for Summative Assessment - formative feedback given in class and via written feedback on individual plans&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Formative in-class student presentations - formative feedback given in class through peer responses and tutor feedback&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</Content>
  </FeedbackMethods>
  <RequirementsList Applicant="Y" Label="Pre/co-requisites" Student="Y">
    <Requirement>
      <UnitCode></UnitCode>
      <UnitTitle></UnitTitle>
      <RequirementType></RequirementType>
      <Description></Description>
    </Requirement>
    <AdditionalRequirement></AdditionalRequirement>
  </RequirementsList>
  <AcademicPrograms Applicant="Y" Label="Academic programmes" Student="Y">
    <AcademicProgram>
      <Program></Program>
      <Plan></Plan>
      <Level></Level>
      <Requirement></Requirement>
    </AcademicProgram>
  </AcademicPrograms>
  <FreeChoice Applicant="Y" Label="Available as a free choice unit?" Student="Y">
    <Content>N</Content>
  </FreeChoice>
  <Accreditation Applicant="Y" Label="Accreditation" Student="Y">
    <Content></Content>
  </Accreditation>
  <RecommendedReading Applicant="Y" Label="Recommended reading" Student="Y">
    <Content>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Athique, Adrian (2016). Transnational Audiences: Media Reception on a Global Scale. Cambridge: Polity Press.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Barker, Martin (2014), ‘Crossing Out the Audience’, in Ian Christie (ed) Audiences, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 187-205&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Barker, Martin and Ernest Mathijs (eds) (2008), Watching the Lord of the Rings: &amp;nbsp; Tolkien’s World Audiences, New York: Peter Lang. Introduction. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Barker, Martin (2006), ‘On Being Ambitious for Audience Research,’ in Isabelle &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Charpentier (ed.) (2006), Comment sont reçues les œuvres, Versailles: Créaphis, pp. 27–42.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Barker, Martin and Kate Brooks (1998), Knowing Audiences: 'Judge Dredd', Its Friends, Fans and Foes, Luton: University of Luton Press. Chapter 4. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Morley, David (2006), ‘Unanswered Questions in Audience Research’, The &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Communication Review, 9.2, 101-21&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Buckingham, David (1991), ‘What are Words Worth?: Interpreting Children’s Talk about Television’, Cultural Studies, 5.2, 228-45.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Click, Melissa [ed] (2019). Anti-Fandom: Dislike and Hate in the Digital Age. New York: NYU Press.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Fiske, John (1992), ‘The Cultural Economy of Fandom’, in Lisa A. Lewis (ed.), The &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media, London and New York: &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Routledge, pp. 30-49. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gaut, Beryl (1999), ‘Identification and Emotion in Narrative Film’, in Carl Plantinga &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;and Greg M. Smith (eds.), Passionate Views: Film, Cognition and Emotion, &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, pp. 200-16.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gray, Jonathan (2021). Dislike-Minded: Media, Audiences and the Dynamics of Taste. New York: NYU Press&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hills, Matt. (2002). Fan Cultures. London: Routledge&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jenkins, Henry (2006a), Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture, &amp;nbsp;New York and London: New York University Press.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jenkins, Henry (2006b), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York: New York University Press. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jenkins, Henry (2007), ‘Afterword: The Future of Fandom’, in Jonathan Gray, Cornel &amp;nbsp;Sandvoss and C. Lee Harrington (eds), Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World, New York: New York University Press, pp. 357-64.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Morley, David (1980), The Nationwide Audience, London: British Film Institute.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Schrøder, Kim, Kirsten Drotner, Stephen Kline and Catherine Murray (2003), Researching Audiences, London and New York: Hodder Arnold.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Staiger, Janet (2005), Media Reception Studies, New York and London: New York University Press.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reinhard, CarrieLynn D., and Olson, Christopher J. (2016) (eds), Making Sense of Cinema: Empirical Studies into Film Spectators and Spectatorship, London &amp;nbsp;and New York: Bloomsbury/Continuum. Introduction.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas, Lyn (2002), Fans, Feminisms and Quality Media, London and New York: Routledge.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Waldron, Darren (2009), Queering Contemporary French Popular Cinema: Images and their Reception, New York: Peter Lang.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</Content>
  </RecommendedReading>
  <StudyHours Applicant="Y" Label="Study hours" Student="Y">
    <IntroText> </IntroText>
    <ScheduledHours Applicant="Y" Label="Scheduled activity hours" Student="Y">
      <ActivityHours>
        <ActivityType>Practical classes &amp; workshops</ActivityType>
        <Hours>33</Hours>
      </ActivityHours>
    </ScheduledHours>
    <PlacementHours Applicant="Y" Label="Placement hours" Student="Y">
      <ActivityHours>
        <ActivityType></ActivityType>
        <Hours>0</Hours>
      </ActivityHours>
    </PlacementHours>
    <TotalHours Applicant="Y" Label="Independent study hours" Student="Y">
      <Hours>267</Hours>
    </TotalHours>
  </StudyHours>
  <Notes Applicant="Y" Label="Additional notes" Student="Y">
    <Content></Content>
  </Notes>
</CourseUnit>
